![beats audio software gearslutz beats audio software gearslutz](https://wpcontent.techpout.com/techpout/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/21155956/Download-Install-and-Update-Beats-Audio-Driver-for-Windows-10-8-7.jpg)
![beats audio software gearslutz beats audio software gearslutz](https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Screen-Shot-2014-09-14-at-2-1.16.53-PM.png)
So, (1) why do I prefer REAPER then, and (2) would I recommend REAPER?īecause (1) I’m a control freak and I love to script my own functions, and so far REAPER has the user-friendliest tools for that. The DAW race today has more to do with which DAW can provide the “best” workflow – which, on the other hand, is so subjective it’s ridiculous. And my experience is that the DAW’s have all been moving toward each other as far as the necessities for making awesome productions is concerned.
![beats audio software gearslutz beats audio software gearslutz](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/muk5LDkcUH4/maxresdefault.jpg)
In between I did some recordings with other DAW’s, but on other peoples gears. I then tried Cubase VST (never impressed me, not even the latter versions), then Cakewalk (which I loved), then Samplitude again (which became my “best DAW” until 2008). I’ve been using DAW’s since the earliest Samplitude years (on Amiga, mind you!). Just that the margins are so fine nowadays that it really shouldn’t matter. Not to say that such votings necessarily must be meaningless to everybody, though. To me, in 2019, it’s a bit like voting for “the best” color. music makers still do votings for ”the best” DAW bought them all every major DAW, gave them advance training in usage for each one (randomly selecting which they were trained on first), locked them in a bunker for 5 years so they were isolated from all network effects, so on and so forth.Īnyway, it's always nice to see that Reaper is recognized. You could perhaps find the "best" DAW if you randomly selected thousands of musicians from various pools such as "professional producer", "bedroom musician", etc. Getting "valid statistics" is actually hard. It could be that the type of people who like Reaper also like answering polls more than usual. Also, the respondents aren't randomly selected. Since the question is "use/ recommend", the answer is also influenced by financials. GearSlutz contains a lot more old farts (myself included). For instance, I frequent some forums where Ableton Live would utterly dominate such a poll. It tells you more about the voters than the winner. And what does "valid" even mean here? It's like when Hit Parader votes Joan Jett one of the best guitarists of all time. now, if the same poll was over 1000 honest users-that would prove more statistically valid eh?ĭepends on how many users they have. The amount of votes makes it kinda invalid imo.